Crime+Scene+Investigation

My name is Detective (Ryan). Two weeks ago I was called to a crime scene (at a fairly new beach house). The alleged victim was (Felix and he coould not keep a job for more than a week he was never very loved but one day his parents died of a mysterious bunji jumping incodent and he inhareted a lot of money so he bought a beach house). The suspect guilty of committing this crime is (Kendra Goode and the motive of this suspect is she wanted Felix dead because she is on his WILL and if he died she would get most of his things and she might even get a little of his cash). This suspect's guilt was confirmed through the testing and results of evidence collected at the crime scene.

The most incriminating piece of evidence was (cup). The evidence was found (This cup was found on the ground on the crime scene). The test performed was (a Fingerprint test). The results of the test were (her fingure prints were on Felixes cup). This connects the suspect to the crime because (this connects to her because they were her fingure prints and it was deffinatly Felixes cup because it had his fingure prints on it to there for Kendra had Felixes cup at one point in time).

The next piece of evidence collected was (the soda inside Felixes cup). It was found (on the back porch on the ground close to Elfredos cup) The test performed was (a PH# test). The results of the test were (the result of the PH# test gave us some more evedence that is was Kendra because Felixes cup had poizen in it and Kendra had Felixes cup and there for she poizend Felix when she had his cup). This connects the suspect to the crime because (this connects to Kendra because she had Felixes cup and it just so happens that he was poizend).

Another piece of evidence collected was (secret note). It was found (on the back of a sheet of paper on the crime scene on the ground). The test performed was ( Tape Lift) (Handwriting analysis). The results of the test were (the letter had not been writen so clear but we manged to make out some of it. It sed Dear,Martha Im glad its over Felix is dead. That is all we could make out of it but we noticed that the person who was writing this letter was Kendra). This connects the suspect to the crime because (this connects to Kendra because her name was found on the letter it was her hand writing and on the reports it sed that they werent sure if felix is dead or not but on this letter it sed that he was.If nobody was sure if he was dead or not how dose she no for sure he is dead she would have had to commit the crime to know that he was dead or not).

The last piece of evidence collected was (a towel). It was found (It was found in a garbage can on the crime scene). The test performed was (We had a smelling station). The results of the test were (we found her initals on the towel and we also found a bottle of colone in the garbage can with the towel and we found out that this bottle of colone was Elfredos and the towel smelled just like the colone found in the garbage can and we came to the conclusion that sje was trying to frame Elfredo we came to this conclusion because why would Elfredo use a towel with her initals on it and why would Elfredo be using Kendras towel it would not make any sense). This connects the suspect to the crime because (this related to Kendra because it was her towel and on are information it sed that she took a shower at 2:30pm so it would make sense that she had the towel it gives us even more evedence that it was her because that towel that she used after she took a shower was found on the crime scene why would she have been on the crime scene with the towel she used after she showerd).

According to the evidence, the following is an account of the events believed to have gone down on that fateful day. ( I think that Kendra took the time to come up with this plan and then it hit her that she would poizen him so she did she took felixes cup when he wasint looking and put ice cubes in his cup and these ice cubes werent just reguler ice cubes they were a mixture of some type of poizen and water and she put them in Felixes cup wen he wasint looking and finally 3:00pm came around and the poizen started taking effect to Felixes body and he died.Right after she poizend him she went and wrote the letter to Martha and then when she was done writing this letter to this Martha Elfredo started yelling to them that Felix is dying to come and help so Kendra ran down to the back porch and she pretended that she was concernd and tried helping and thats when the note fell out of her pocket she did not relize that the note fell out of her pocket she was to busy acting).

Therefore, (Kendra Goode) committed the crime of (murder) for (Felixes personal belongings and some of Felixes money).

Incomplete: Podcast not uploaded.

**Rubric for Podcasts** introduction. Provides relevant information and establishes a clear purpose engaging the listener immediately. || Describes the topic and engages the audience as the introduction proceeds. || Somewhat engaging (covers well-known topic), and provides a vague purpose. || Irrelevant or inappropriate topic that minimally engages listener. Does not include an introduction or the purpose is vague and unclear. ||^  ||
 * ** CATEGORY ** || ** Exemplary **  || ** Proficient **  || ** Partially Proficient **  || ** Incomplete **  || ** POINTS **  ||
 * ** Introduction ** || ** 3 points ** || ** 2 points ** || ** 1 points ** || ** 0 points ** || ||
 * ^  || Catchy and clever
 * ^  || Tells who is speaking, date the podcast was produced, and where the speaker is located.  || Tells most of the following: who is speaking, date of the podcast, and location of speaker.  || Alludes to who is speaking, date of the podcast, and location of speaker.  || Speaker is not identified. No production date or location of the speaker is provided.  ||^   ||
 * ** Content ** || ** 6 points ** || ** 4 points ** || ** 2 points ** || ** 0 points ** || ||
 * ^  || __**The motive was detailed and clearly based on information delivered throughout the investigation.**__  || The motive is detailed and based on partial information delivered throughout the investigation.  || The motive is not very detailed and is sprinkled with inaccurate information.  || The motive is missing, or unclear or all information is inaccurate.  ||^   ||
 * ^  || __**Four pieces of strong evidence were presented and linked to the suspect in an organized, methodical manner.**__  || Three or four pieces of evidence were presented and/or linked to the suspect in a somewhat organized, thoughtful manner.  || Two pieces of shaky evidence were presented and/or loosely linked to the suspect. Lack of organization.  || One to no pieces of unimportant evidence were presented in an unorganized manner.  ||^   ||
 * ^  || __**The events in the scenario are detailed, extremely organized and strongly supported with evidence and facts related to the crime scene.**__  || The events in the scenario are well organized, somewhat detailed, and supported with evidence from the crime scene. || The events in the crime scene lack organization, detail, and are weakly supported with evidence from the crime scene. || There was no clear direction and evidence was unimportant. ||^   ||
 * ^  || **__Conclusion clearly summarizes key information.__**  || Conclusion summarizes information.  || Conclusion vaguely summarizes key information  || No conclusion is provided.  ||^   ||
 * ** Delivery ** || ** 3 points ** || ** 2 points ** || ** 1 point ** || ** 0 points ** || ||
 * ^  || Well rehearsed, smooth delivery in a conversational style.  || Rehearsed, smooth delivery.  || Appears unrehearsed with uneven delivery.  || Delivery is hesitant, and choppy and sounds like the presenter is reading.  ||^   ||
 * ^  || Highly effective enunciation and presenter's speech is clear and intelligible, not distant and muddled. Expression, and rhythm keep the audience listening. || Enunciation, expression, pacing are effective throughout the podcast.  || Enunciation, expression, rhythm are sometimes distracting during the podcast.  || Enunciation of spoken word is distant and muddled and not clear. Expression and rhythm are distracting throughout the podcast.  ||^   ||
 * ^  || Correct grammar is used throughout the podcast.  || Correct grammar is used during most of the podcast.  || Occasionally incorrect grammar is used during the podcast.  || Poor grammar is used throughout the podcast.  ||^   ||
 * ** Graphic and Music Enhancements ** || ** 3 points ** || ** 2 points ** || ** 1 points ** || ** 0 points ** || ||
 * ^  || Music enhances the mood, quality, and understanding of the presentation.  || Music provides supportive background to the podcast.  || Music provides somewhat distracting background to the podcast.  || Music is distracting to presentation.  ||^   ||
 * ^  || All music enhancements are owned by the creator of the podcast or copyright cleared with appropriate documentation.  || Music enhancements are owned by the creator of the podcast or copyright cleared.  || Use of copyrighted works is questionable.  || Copyright infringement is obvious.  ||^   ||
 * ** Technical Production ** || ** 3 points ** || ** 2 points ** || ** 1 points ** || ** 0 points ** || ||
 * ^  || Presentation is recorded in a quiet environment without background noise and distractions.  || Presentation is recorded in a quiet environment with minimal background noise and distractions.  || Presentation is recorded in a semi-quiet environment with some background noise and distractions.  || Presentation is recorded in a noisy environment with constant background noise and distractions.  ||^   ||
 * ^  || Transitions are smooth and spaced correctly without noisy, dead space.  || Transitions are smooth with a minimal amount of ambient noise.  || Transitions are uneven with inconsistent spacing; ambient noise is present.  || Transitions are abrupt and background noise needs to be filtered.  ||^   ||
 * ^  || Volume of voice, music, and effects enhance the presentation.  || Volume is acceptable.  || Volume is occasionally inconsistent.  || Volume changes are highly distracting.  ||^   ||
 * ^  || Podcast length keeps the audience interested and engaged.  || Podcast length keeps audience listening.  || Podcast length is somewhat long or somewhat short to keep audience engaged.  || Podcast is either too long or too short to keep the audience engaged.  ||^   ||
 * ** TOTAL POINTS ** || /57  ||